There are three great ways to find the Six Sigma information that you're looking for on this site...
Six Sigma is driven from the “outside-in,” that is, it begins with the customer. The emphasis is on understanding customer needs and translating them into requirements for core processes.
It creates a culture where the customer comes first and there is an unrelenting focus on exceeding customer expectations...
As Jack Welch Stated...
“The best projects begin not inside the business but outside it, focused on answering the questions, How can we make the customer more competitive? What is critical to the customer’s success? One thing we have discovered with certainty is that everything we do that makes the customer more successful inevitably results in a financial return for us.”
Before Six Sigma There Were Lessons Learned...
Go back in time and watch as America awakens and unravels. Witness Dr. Deming first changing Japan and then America.
Learn more about the history of quality here.
Motorola had always been and was still one of the world's best manufacturers, regardless of the hard times it was facing.
CEO Bob Galvin decided to check Sundry's claims. Instead of calling on executives he visited Motorola factories, shipping docks and other operations. He went all the way through the entire process to the individual end-users. And when he got there, they told him, "Your Quality Stinks."
Motorola was ready for change! They were BLEEDING MONEY and knew that higher quality products would reduce production costs as well as increase customer satisfaction.
Bill Smith, a Quality Engineer from Motorola, is credited with being the Father of Six Sigma.
Smith worked with co-founder Dr. Mikel Harry who eventually developed the four-stage Six Sigma Process: Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (MAIC). The Define (D) phase was later added by GE (DMAIC).
Bill Smith wrote an internal quality report at Motorola which eventually caught the attention of CEO Bob Galvin. The report sat on Galvin's desk for two years before Smith worked up the courage to ask Galvin if he had read it.
Sadly Bill Smith passed away in the cafeteria at Motorola. He never made a dime from his work.
Listen as his wife tells the story...
In the mid 1980's Bob Galvin of Motorola articulated the first objectives of a new Process Improvement Program.
In 1988 Motorola won the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award.
Texas Instruments and ABB work closely with Motorola to further develop the process. Application experts begin leaving Motorola for "greener pastures" elsewhere.
In 1995 AlliedSignal begins its initiative directed by Larry Bossidy. Bossidy's success captures the interest of Wall Street.
Although Six Sigma clearly began at Motorola, it was GE’s wide scale adoption and success that truly opened the eyes of the business world.
In 1995 Jack Welch invited his friend, Allied Signal CEO Bossidy, to speak at GE’s executive council meeting. Bossidy was a highly regarded ex-GE vice chairman.
Welch was skeptical but requested a financial analysis. Their analysis showed that shifting their processes to Six Sigma capability would save GE $10 billion.
Jack Welch, begins the most widespread undertaking of Six Sigma even attempted. By October 1995 it was company policy at GE. Dr. Mikel Harry was hired and spent the next 4 years training GE managers.
Welch insisted that no one would be promoted to a management position without at least a Green Belt. Welch stated that Six Sigma was the most ambitious undertaking the company had ever taken on...
His speeches to executive staff are legendary....
The one thing that any company can do, whether in good times or bad, to yield financial benefit is to INVEST IN AND IMPROVE QUALITY. Reducing defects and non-value added activities in processes delivers immediate benefits.
Studies in industry show that the average company is three to four Sigma. Sadly, many of these companies are firmly set in their ways, complacent in the knowledge that they are at least as good as their competition.
Among the traits shared by these companies are...
Major differences in philosophy, policies and procedures, actions, behaviors, and beliefs, between companies which are at four Sigma capability and those which are at six.
The biggest single difference is mindset!
Under-achieving companies are complacent, unaware and unable to accept the idea that they must make quantum leaps in process quality if they are to gain, and keep, their competitive advantage.
The benefits of achieving Six Sigma are clear and obvious, both from the company's standpoint, and more importantly, from their customer's standpoint.
The company is able to produce its product in the most efficient means possible, resulting in an end product which is very competitively priced and of the highest possible quality. Truly, "The highest quality producer is the lowest cost producer".
If all departments in a company are operating at Six Sigma, then the products will be at the top of their market and far ahead of the competition.
But! Product quality is not an automatic guarantee of success; even a product with excellent manufacturing quality will fail in a market place that does not want it, or where it is not adequately supported.
May 10, 16 09:24 PM
A Quality Control Plan is a documented description of the activities needed to control a process or product. The objective of a QCP is to minimize variation.
May 10, 16 08:49 PM
The Largest Collection of Free Six Sigma Tools and Training on the Web!
May 10, 16 07:28 PM
The Weibull distribution is applicable to make population predictions around a wide variety of patterns of variation.